<div dir="ltr">I think you don't understand me. My point was that if a charity was using equipment and/or software that was THAT outdated, then they are obviously do not have a sophisticated IT setup and I doubt that they would be surprised that some random printer that they were given didn't work because they couldn't find a driver. Hell, I bet they wouldn't even know where to go to look for one, and the donated tyranno-winprinter would go into the dumpster where it belongs anyway.<br>
<br>This whole hypothetical situation, IMHO, is just a manufactured drama. If someone knows a charity that has EXACTLY this problem, put it out here, with a detailed description of their setup, and let's see if we can get folks to find a better solution for them. I just think it's getting a bit absurd to keep talking about the hypothetical, but then again that seems to be the favored profession of many here... ;-)<br>
<br>Jeffrey.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Luke -Jr <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:luke@dashjr.org">luke@dashjr.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Jeffrey Watts wrote:<br>
> If they're running Windows98, they clearly have very low expectations for<br>
> success.<br>
<br>
</div>Success for a charity is pretty much complete with a single "customer".<br>
Why would a charity run anything other than 98 anyway?<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><br>"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself." -- Thomas Paine<br>
</div>