<span class="q">Let's look again at my tagline's more sinister implications.<br>People with _hostile_ intent who by default will "find"<br>something you have done-and use it against you .<br>Absent finding things they will fabricate evidence.
<br>Primarily it seems merely to "justify" their salary.<br>More sinister still is their extending the process.<br><br>Eventually we WILL have a situation where no matter <br>how cautious you are - you are breaking some law or rule.
<br>Some mundane action even if otherwise "innocent" and<br>"They get you for it"<br> <br>SO to restate the concept-<br><br>"Is it paranoia if there REALLY are hostile people in your daily world<br>
intent on catching you at something-or fabricating it- <br>so they can justify their salary?"<br><br>And where does this ramble go back at all "on topic? "<br>The mention of KDE storing "userdata" in distributed locations.
<br>It took me a while to abstract the similarity.<br>But the windows pattern of increasing layers of "userdata"<br>hidden in multiple locations and even ROT-13 obscured to <br>keep those with no "need to know" from even knowing it's
<br>THERE! Makes it easier to "get you". Of course you are innocent?<br>Oh? So when "they" find something prohibited on your hard drive?<br>And "Zero Tolerance" takes over? The real truth ?<br>
I now openly suspect KDE of eventual userdata replication in places <br>NOT well documented to the mundane usere.<br>Even if it's not the KDE team's goal- the damage is the same.<br></span>